 |
| SEA GAMES INDONESIAN2011 |
Wisma bribery case development for the SEA Games Athletes in Palembang increasingly demanding toughness of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Not solely for allegedly dragging the Democratic Party in power, but also because of change-change that the testimony of the suspect Mindo Manulang Rosalina.
Rosa pulled the minutes of the examination (BAP). He said do not know Nazaruddin, Treasurer of the Democratic Party. Recognition that the new Rosa ultimately congruent with Nazaruddin version of the story that they did not know each other.
Prior to revoke the BAP, Rosa has made a surprise by firing lawyer Kamaruddin Simanjuntak. Whereas the first Kamaruddinlah open any alleged involvement of the ruling party.
The suspect, of course, have the right to change the caption. However, as disclosed Kamaruddin Simanjuntak, Rosa does not change the information if from the beginning Rosa is under the supervision of the Witness and Victims Protection Institution.
While still existed as a lawyer Rosa, Kamaruddin has asked the KPK to immediately protect the clients who received threats. Rosa was threatened for not linking bribery case in the Ministry of Youth and Sports had with his superiors in PT Children Affairs, which Nazaruddin, who is also Treasurer of the Democratic Party.
But demand for Rosa protected Kamaruddin was not honored. And there was a series of changes, among others, most importantly, that Rosa did not know then say the Democratic Party Treasurer Nazaruddin.
Witness protection is barely audible used by the KPK. One reason is because the Commission works primarily based on evidence, not verbal testimony of witnesses.
But the failure to present key witnesses Nunun Nurbaeti Dorodjatun in election bribery case of Bank Indonesia deputy governor Miranda should be a lesson to the Commission regarding the importance of implementing witness protection agency.
Especially for cases relating to power, we push the Commission to use the witness protection agency for all those involved in corruption that can be dismantled completely. Whether it would have been a key witness suddenly 'disappeared' and suffering from 'dementia'?
On the basis of that perspective also, Witnesses and Victims Protection Agency should not be passive as regulated in Law Number 13 of 2006 on Protection of Witnesses and Victims.
The Institute should be proactive in protecting witnesses. That is the essence of which is set in the United Nations Convention Against Corruption or the United Nations Convention Against Corruption in 2003 which was ratified by Indonesia three years later.
The Convention states that to every country that ratifies must provide effective protection against a witness or expert from retaliation or intimidation, including his family or others close to them.
So do not just sit waiting for a request in writing the protection of witnesses, either on its own initiative or at the request of the authorities. However, do not be too too 'proactive' for the sake of rupiah as happened in the case Anggodo Widjojo. When that happens, the protector even be arrested by KPK.
Rosa pulled the minutes of the examination (BAP). He said do not know Nazaruddin, Treasurer of the Democratic Party. Recognition that the new Rosa ultimately congruent with Nazaruddin version of the story that they did not know each other.
Prior to revoke the BAP, Rosa has made a surprise by firing lawyer Kamaruddin Simanjuntak. Whereas the first Kamaruddinlah open any alleged involvement of the ruling party.
The suspect, of course, have the right to change the caption. However, as disclosed Kamaruddin Simanjuntak, Rosa does not change the information if from the beginning Rosa is under the supervision of the Witness and Victims Protection Institution.
While still existed as a lawyer Rosa, Kamaruddin has asked the KPK to immediately protect the clients who received threats. Rosa was threatened for not linking bribery case in the Ministry of Youth and Sports had with his superiors in PT Children Affairs, which Nazaruddin, who is also Treasurer of the Democratic Party.
But demand for Rosa protected Kamaruddin was not honored. And there was a series of changes, among others, most importantly, that Rosa did not know then say the Democratic Party Treasurer Nazaruddin.
Witness protection is barely audible used by the KPK. One reason is because the Commission works primarily based on evidence, not verbal testimony of witnesses.
But the failure to present key witnesses Nunun Nurbaeti Dorodjatun in election bribery case of Bank Indonesia deputy governor Miranda should be a lesson to the Commission regarding the importance of implementing witness protection agency.
Especially for cases relating to power, we push the Commission to use the witness protection agency for all those involved in corruption that can be dismantled completely. Whether it would have been a key witness suddenly 'disappeared' and suffering from 'dementia'?
On the basis of that perspective also, Witnesses and Victims Protection Agency should not be passive as regulated in Law Number 13 of 2006 on Protection of Witnesses and Victims.
The Institute should be proactive in protecting witnesses. That is the essence of which is set in the United Nations Convention Against Corruption or the United Nations Convention Against Corruption in 2003 which was ratified by Indonesia three years later.
The Convention states that to every country that ratifies must provide effective protection against a witness or expert from retaliation or intimidation, including his family or others close to them.
So do not just sit waiting for a request in writing the protection of witnesses, either on its own initiative or at the request of the authorities. However, do not be too too 'proactive' for the sake of rupiah as happened in the case Anggodo Widjojo. When that happens, the protector even be arrested by KPK.
MOTIVATOR TODAY :
0 comments:
Post a Comment